Lamb, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will in conflict relationships (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). In the event the I’m not sensuous, are you presently gorgeous or not?: Physical-elegance recommendations and dating preferences as a purpose of a person’s own elegance. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]
https://datingmentor.org/nl/filipino-cupid-overzicht/
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in marriage and other close relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of ambition. Inside the J. McV. Have a look (Ed.), Identity additionally the conclusion problems (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Force. [ Hyperlinks ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationship matchmaking destiny with insiders’ and you can outsiders’ perspective: Exactly who and what exactly is asked things. Personal Dating, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will marital quality in newly weds: One or two centered method. Record off Character and you will Societal Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]
Legitimizing facts throughout the initiation away from heterosexual dating
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, E. R. (2006). Identified resemblance and you may relationships achievement one of dating people: An enthusiastic idiographic strategy. Diary regarding Personal and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880. [ Website links ]
Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, Good. (2006). Internet dating. Arizona, DC: Report to your Pew Internet & American Existence Endeavor. Recovered , from [ Hyperlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Determining the accuracy away from forecasts on matchmaking matchmaking: Just how and why perform lovers’ forecasts differ from those people produced by perceiver? Personality and you can Societal Psychology Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Links ]
This new destination-similarity hypothesis one of get across-sex family: Dating satisfaction, imagined parallels, and you may care about-providing perceptions
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Report exhibited during the Basic Internationally Conference towards Individual Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Links ]
Merkle, Elizabeth.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.A great. (2000). Digital dating and you will digital associated: Conceptualizing computers mediated personal matchmaking. Friends, forty two, 187-192. [ Website links ]
Montoya, R. Meters., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try real resemblance very important to destination? A good meta-analysis out-of genuine and recognized resemblance. Diary from Public and private Dating, 25, 889-922. [ Links ]
Morry, Yards. Meters. (2005). Matchmaking fulfillment as the a predictor from similarity product reviews; An examination of one’s attraction-resemblance hypothesis. Record out-of Public and private Matchmaking, 22, 561-584. [ Website links ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you will extension of one’s SVR idea away from dyadic pairing. Journal off ily, forty two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will split up: An excellent fourteen-year longitudinal examination of black lovers and you can light couples. Diary regarding Social and personal Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). The new love algorithm Suits thinks it’s found an algorithm having governing the web matchmaking organization: A scientific way to find Mr. or Ms. Proper. Company 2.0 Mag. Retrieved with the away from [ Website links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent endure – Character similarities when you look at the lovers. Identity and Private Differences, forty five, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Lover preferences: Just what services perform individuals appeal inside their quick-identity sexual and much time-name intimate couples? Journal out of Mindset and Human Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). Brand new character of your care about throughout the initiation and you can span of societal correspondence. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can in conflict dating (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]